[Legal Q&A] Convertible Debt vs. Equity

Question: What are the advantages and disadvantages of convertible debt vs. equity?

Answer: As we’ve discussed in previous postings, I am very much in favor of the convertible note scenario for non-institutional rounds of financing. To recap, the convertible note structure replaces the sale by early stage companies of equity securities, at a set valuation per share, with the sale of promissory notes that are convertible into Company equity in connection with the next round of equity financing by the Company (usually defined as the “first round of institutional equity financing”).

The upside to the convertible note structure is that you can get to a deal faster—without the haggling over valuation at an early stage of a company’s development when there usually isn’t a whole lot upon which to base that discussion. As a result of the transaction being a debt deal, the covenants and protective provisions with respect to Company operations are more abbreviated than those found in equity deal documentation. It is also unnecessary to spell out the detailed management and interest transfer provisions that are always found in institutional-level equity purchase documents. This translates into a transaction that allows the Company to obtain equity-like cash funding much faster and less expensively.

The downside to the convertible note structure results from the convertible note holders demanding a conversion rate for their debt that reflects too high a discount to the purchase price paid by the institutional players in the equity round. The institutional equity players are familiar with the convertible note structure and in almost all cases accept a discount of up to 15%–an acceptable cost for the “early funding” risk taken by the note holders. But when the convertible note holders demand a discount in excess of that level (and they frequently do—especially if the distance between note funding and equity round exceeds 12 months), you can run into resistance from the institutional round players. This can hold up—or kill– your equity round while the note holders and the institutional equity players have fun playing “chicken” –at your expense– over the acceptable level of discount to the purchase price.

So, be careful sports fans. It’s dangerous out there.


Question provided by Bruce Colwin – (LinkedIn, Twitter) President & CEO of LegalMinds Media LLC .

LegalMinds Media LLC

Answer provided by Peter Rothberg – (website, LinkedIn Twitter), Partner at Duane Morris, Ultra Light Startups sponsor and counsel.


Ask your own question of Ultra Light Startups experts. Just fill in this form on the Ultra Light Startups website and check the ULS blog or the ULS email newsletter for the answer.

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

Bruce Colwin June 11, 2010 at 10:22 pm

Thanks, Peter. What are your thoughts on provisions for a liquidation preference (ie. 2x investment) should there be an acquisition prior to a Series A?

Reply

Bruce Colwin June 11, 2010 at 6:22 pm

Thanks, Peter. What are your thoughts on provisions for a liquidation preference (ie. 2x investment) should there be an acquisition prior to a Series A?

Reply

Peter Rothberg June 12, 2010 at 6:28 pm

Bruce, that’s not market. Very excessive.

What I’ve seen in this context is: (1) full principal and accrued interest paid, plus a 10% premium on that full amount; and/or (2) the ability to convert principal and accrued interest into equity immediately prior to the transaction closing at the same discount to the price per share in the acquisition as though it were a financing. That’s much more reasonable.

Peter

Reply

Peter Rothberg June 12, 2010 at 2:28 pm

Bruce, that’s not market. Very excessive.

What I’ve seen in this context is: (1) full principal and accrued interest paid, plus a 10% premium on that full amount; and/or (2) the ability to convert principal and accrued interest into equity immediately prior to the transaction closing at the same discount to the price per share in the acquisition as though it were a financing. That’s much more reasonable.

Peter

Reply

Zeke June 30, 2010 at 6:46 am

I am currently working with a group of lawyers and businesspeople on an open source law project (http://groups.google.com/group/deal-lawyers). Although I’ve previously voiced my reservations re: the convertible note, due to the instrument’s popularity our first project is in fact building a curated convertible note form.

I’ve posted a draft term sheet on the group site. The draft would benefit greatly from experienced comments, particularly regarding the conversion triggers and valuation mechanism.

Once we have finalized the term sheet, we will be using that as an outline to prepare a curated convertible note form (combining loan agreement, note, and security agreement in one doc) that I hope will be useful for early-stage finance deals. The resulting legal forms, to the extent any copyright protection extends, will be Creative Commons Attribution-licensed.

If this is of potential interest to anyone here, you can request an invite directly from the group site and I will approve it the next time I log on. Individual as well as law firm participation is welcome.

Zeke

Reply

Zeke June 30, 2010 at 2:46 am

I am currently working with a group of lawyers and businesspeople on an open source law project (http://groups.google.com/group/deal-lawyers). Although I’ve previously voiced my reservations re: the convertible note, due to the instrument’s popularity our first project is in fact building a curated convertible note form.

I’ve posted a draft term sheet on the group site. The draft would benefit greatly from experienced comments, particularly regarding the conversion triggers and valuation mechanism.

Once we have finalized the term sheet, we will be using that as an outline to prepare a curated convertible note form (combining loan agreement, note, and security agreement in one doc) that I hope will be useful for early-stage finance deals. The resulting legal forms, to the extent any copyright protection extends, will be Creative Commons Attribution-licensed.

If this is of potential interest to anyone here, you can request an invite directly from the group site and I will approve it the next time I log on. Individual as well as law firm participation is welcome.

Zeke

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 18 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: